We’ve now collected about $31,000 due to the outstanding efforts of our block captains and neighborhood coordinators. They’ve been hitting the streets and hitting up those who had not previously given—good job all! Thank You!
But, we’re still $19,000 short of our goal for trial money—trial is still scheduled for November 24th – 26th, Hamilton County Superior Court #1. Time is running out.
Please, if you have not donated do so right now!
Go to www.SayNoToFishers.com and click “Donate Now” to donate online. Or, mail a check payable to Geist United Opposition, P.O. Box 56023, Indianapolis, IN 46256.
We have and continue to provide updated lists to our block captains of those who signed the remonstrance but have not yet contributed any money to the cause. It’s only fair that everyone contribute because everyone has saved thousands of dollars in additional property taxes due to our collective efforts. And, more savings may be realized simply by taking this to trial.
In the spirit of Thanksgiving, please donate now.
Joinder Withdrawal Referendum Passed
As you probably saw in the paper, the referendum for Fall Creek Township to withdraw from the joinder agreement with Noblesville (and, thereby Fishers) for planning and zoning control passed. This gives the Fall Creek Township board the go-ahead to formally withdraw from the agreement, which is the next step in the process.
Also, on Monday, November 10th, the Hamilton County Commissioners voted to have the County Planning Commission begin the process of including unincorporated Fall Creek Township into the County plans (master development plan and zoning control). This was viewed by the Commissioners as a fail-safe measure in case the fly in the ointment survives.
The fly-in-the-ointment is—you guessed it—the Fishers Town Council. Prior to the referendum they passed an ordinance giving the Town planning and zoning control over unincorporated areas within two miles of their border (which is almost all of unincorporated Fall Creek Township), which is allowed by state law. Legal or not, clearly, the Town Council will do what it wants regardless of the will of the people.
What happens next depends on a couple of things. One, the Fall Creek Township board needs to vote to withdraw from the joinder. Two, a group of affected citizens will need to file a law suit to have a court figure out whether the Town Council’s action stands or the will of the people stands, as both the County and the Township have said they will not take this to court.
By way of background: Currently, zoning and planning for the unincorporated areas of Fall Creek Township (much of which is the Geist area) is provided by the Town of Fishers. Originally, the Township entered into an agreement (joinder) with the City of Noblesville, in which the Township asked Noblesville to provide this service. In 2004, Noblesville turned this responsibility over to Fishers, but the agreement is still between Noblesville and the Township. By withdrawing from the joinder with Noblesville, the result will be to terminate Fishers’ zoning control over unincorporated Fall Creek Township.
Why is this an issue? Much of the Geist area was developed under the plans and zoning control of Noblesville, which is different from the plans and zoning control of Fishers. Although Noblesville ceded zoning control to Fishers, the Town was supposed to enforce the Noblesville zoning rules; instead, they enforced their own zoning rules (and why would that be a surprise?).
The application of Fishers’ zoning rules has had some negative consequences for our area. Remember the Masthead sign issue? The signs were fine until Masthead spent a lot of money to replace the signs; suddenly, they found the replacements no longer met the zoning requirements. Others have had to move driveways during construction; while the placement met the Noblesville rules, it didn’t meet the Fishers rules.
More to the point, we are not represented by the Fishers Town Council nor does the Fishers Planning Commission have much of a tendency to listen to us. And, even Scott Faultless has said that the Council tends not to pay much attention to non-residents. Thus, we have no input into planning and zoning over our own property.
If zoning is moved to the County, which would be the result of terminating the joinder agreement, then we will have a voice since we elect and are represented by the County Commissioners.
Of course, the Fishers Town Council is saying they passed the ordinance to protect us from the zoning vacuum that will result if the Township board votes to withdraw from the joinder. You saw the signs warning against junk yards and landfills (like anyone would spend the money for property out here for a junk yard). But, of course, there wouldn’t be a vacuum as the status quo would be maintained until the County established the zoning for the area.
If you think zoning should go to the County and not to the Town of Fishers (which is what the majority of voters said), then you should make your wishes known to the Fall Creek Township Trustee and board (contact Terry Michael, Township Trustee, at 317-585-9600).
You can also contact Joe Weingarten (mrmac@aol.com) to learn more about this issue and how you can help.